thing 9: Scholarship as Conversation

Recommended Readings, Resources, and Examples

Carroll, A. J., & Dasler, R. (2015). “Scholarship is a Conversation”: Discourse, Attribution, and Twitter’s Role in Information Literacy Instruction. http://creativelibrarypractice.org/2015/03/11/scholarship-is-a-conversation/

Choose Your Own Adventure Activity

Select one of the following activities to complete:

  1. Locate an example of an article or lesson plan that describes an approach to teaching using the frame Scholarship is a Conversation. In a comment, post a link to the article or lesson plan (or a citation if paywalled) along with a short summary of what you read. How could you adapt or build upon this approach at your own institution?
  2. Drawing inspiration from one of the recommended readings, draft your own lesson plan related to the frame Scholarship is a Conversation. Upload your lesson plan to Project CORA and/or the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Sandbox, and post a link to it here.

8 comments

  1. I took a look at this lesson: http://sandbox.acrl.org/library-collection/scholarship-conversation-case-study-coffee-super-food-or-health-threat.

    I loved this lesson! I loved the incorporation of both short videos and audio recordings and a reading as I think students enjoy having information from various mediums, and I also thought both the short videos and the reading were interesting enough and short enough to keep the student engaged.

    The first short video uses the analogy of a conversation at a party where you overhear various conversations and make links between them in your own mind. The second recording contains a discussion about study replication and how what we regard as “truth” can change over time, and raises the question as to whether this means findings are useless, which I think is an appropriate question for students to think through on the issue of scholarship as conversation. Incidentally, I loved that this recording also touched on the evolution of news stories as news outlets gain more information, as this is an important part of understanding the news life-cycle and media ethics, and I don’t think many people really understand or have considered that.

    The lesson plan then suggests having students break into small groups to discuss the reading, which discusses various milestones in what we have believed about the health effects of coffee, and to ask them to discuss that article in light of what they learned from the video and audio recording. The group then comes back together to discuss their thoughts and conclusions reached in small groups, as well as a chance to “circle back to course purview and research assignments, and emphasize to students that they are “emerging researchers and emerging scholars” and they are the next participants in the conversation. They may be the contributors of new research knowledge in the future.

    Overall I really liked this lesson a lot, and I think students will also. I think students might identify well with this particular topic, as I am guessing they’ve seen the changing headlines about the health of coffee over the last several years and, once it is pointed out to them, might be curious about why that is and how we should interpret it. I can imagine students being very engaged in this activity and taking a lot away from it.
    I don’t think I would change anything about this lesson, other than maybe come up with some other examples so that different groups could look at different examples and then share what they learned with the group and do some comparing and contrasting.

    Like

  2. This guide (https://library.wcupa.edu/c.php?g=449010&p=3064840) provides LOs for assessment via various assessment methods, but I am extrapolating one of the LOs for this discussion:

    Students will be able to distinguish between scholarly and non-scholarly (popular) sources.
    Which of the following is a scholarly source?
    Is the following a scholarly source? (providing a citation or description)

    Presently, I am revamping our library instructional module to better fit the Framework, or should I say that I’m rebuilding our library instruction to the specifications laid out by the Framework. Over the course of the spring semester, I have read articles pertaining to the Framework and its implementation, and I have surveyed the faculty for their input into future library instruction. This particular frame, “scholarship as conversation,” is NOT one of the frames they ranked highly as compared to the five other frames. So, I know that future library instructions will be specifically focused on a couple of the other frames.

    However, aspects of this particular frame can be applied within any library instruction. One such possibility that comes to mind would be to to have students break out into pairs, with each pair receiving two items, ex. article, photograph, book, etc. Each pair would be asked to assess their items based on a rubric that they received from me that outlined readily identifiable markers of scholarly work. After that group work finished, it would be time for a class discussion about other ways/means of identifying reliable information, scholarly or not.

    While most of the instructions that we do are one-shots and as such, are more narrowly focused, a class discussion about identifying scholarly information and reliable information can and should happen.

    Like

  3. The article that I chose on scholarship as conversation: https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9635/11058 dealt with library instruction in nonprofit management education (NME). The authors rightly state that research in this “young” discipline is highly scattered, with a lack of standardized terminology.This instruction session began with a preselected article to discuss, chosen by the instructor. Before class, the students answered open-ended questions about the selected article. The preselected article helped to save time and focus attention on the topic of scholarship as conversation. During class, students divided into groups and analyzed the conversation taking place when the article was written and saw who had cited the article later. They looked at the different kinds of terminology used. They then reflected on the experience they had. The students found the experience valuable, and the authors suggested some ways to improve the experience. One idea was to pick an article on a high-interest topic that could be linked to the class. This exercise is probably most effective with beginning students. More advanced students would probably rather explore on their own than read an article picked out for them.

    Like

  4. I wish I had more time to cover this in the instruction sessions I perform. Luckily, one of the primary databases I use gives a snapshot of how a research article might exists within the context of larger research. We cover citation chasing from bibliographies as a way to find primary sources and/or double check what is being put forth in a research article. (I’ve used Wikipedia’s references/notes as a way to highlight the importance of paying attention to what was published before and how it gets interpreted/used when it’s cited in later research or writings.) The database, PubMed, also lists if any comments have been published by the journal addressing an article and where this article was cited in PubMed Central. A Google “cited by” search can also be run if students are curious to find more. Usually the PMC links are enough to show how research begets more research.

    Another way i would love to showcase the importance of citations but haven’t had the chance is by presenting an article/opinion piece that I know they’d like to rebut. One way of critiquing a piece is double checking to make sure they’ve accurately represented the research they’re citing. I’d divvy up the class to find the original source material for some of the article’s claims. Except, I’ve noticed when I’ve tried to track down primary sources, poorly done or incomplete citations often make finding that original research very difficult. They might find it as frustrating as I do. They should not be like those authors.

    Like

  5. University of Cincinnati Libraries has a brief video that explains Scholarship as a Conversation—Research 101: Scholarship is a Conversation by Kali Stoehr and Anna Eisen, with voice by Kimberley Tate: http://guides.libraries.uc.edu/infoliteracy/conversation

    It uses as its example the conversations a person overhears while at a party and how the listener may either join a conversation or take pieces of different conversations and make connections between them to expand the topic. The multiple conversations going on at a party represent the multiple academic conversations; one conversation or article does not represent coverage of the whole topic.

    Similar to Carroll and Dasler’s article using Twitter as an example, Stoehr and Eisen use another scenario with which students are familiar to present the idea of how students can enter the ongoing scholarly conversation.

    Like

  6. I enjoyed the reading for this one, but I wish they included a class outline or something.

    I have often touched on Scholarship as Conversation by talking about seeing who cited a specific article using Google Scholar. I usually bring it up in more upper level classes in demo form in sessions that are more workshop-y than what I would do for lower level courses.

    I like both of the activities posted above too! I think these could be good for lower level courses and Heather’s specifically would be good as a more structured session in an upper level course.

    Like

  7. This exercise in the Sandbox – Citation: A (very) Brief Introduction, contributed by Jesse Lopez from North Carolina State University, succinctly explains the need to cite sources:
    (http://sandbox.acrl.org/library-collection/citation-very-brief-introduction)

    After watching this video, I would have students view these two videos:

    Scholarship as Conversation
    https://youtu.be/6JS3S0Y4-ZQ by WVU Libraries

    and

    Scholarship is a Conversation
    https://youtu.be/LT86Np7NW1Q by Daniel Chesney

    and discuss what they mean to them – did they realize that their research could contribute to the scholarly conversation?

    Regarding the reading – Since most of our students have used Twitter, or have knowledge about the tweets being generated in the last few months, they should be made aware of what is actually happening when something is retweeted. By making the comparison of retweeting with citing sources, I think this exercise would be an eye-opener for many of our students. The example from Borrowing Sam would help them to understand the need for referencing the source of any information generated.

    Like

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s